Talk about how oil and gas companies can dictate oil price. Well certainly having a hand in every major venture like it would seem Koch Industries has been could definitely impact on the price of gas, especially when you considered all the assets Koch Industries owns all around the world. To top that Republicans in Congress want the President to make a decision on the Keystone XL in sixty days (they added this to the Payroll tax extention bill where it should not have been), ignoring the environmental dangers, but through further investigation it appears the company that suppose to be over everything is only the operator and other companies through partnerships are the ones behind it all.
As the story goes TransCanada is trying to run pipelines from Canada to Texas then to Illinois, which is known as the Keystone XL, but it would seem that other companies like TransCanada Northern Border Inc., (affiliated with TransCanada and TransCanada Northern Border Inc. is subsidiary of ONEOK), ONEOK, and Koch Industries through partnerships appeared to have been involved in this Keystone XL deal began years ago. It seems the proposed plan for ONEOK and everthing it has attempted to do since 2005 seems the same plan that we associate with TransCanada the Corporation. There are too many similarities that point to other owners of the Keystone XL, and Republican leaders on Congress want the President to make a decision on this in less than sixty days. That doesn’t include the fact the dangerous risk involved in this Keystone project to the environment at the risk of Americans’ health. ONEOK was founded in 1906 and was known as ‘Oklahoma Natural Gas Company’, before changing it’s name. Through further research it appears ONEOK bought in 2005 from Koch Industries what would be a key part that would be known as the Keystone XL that ran to Texas. Interesting part is though there may be a partnership that form and maybe still lasts today, but then on the flip-sides these oil and gas companies do have a history selling and merging from company to the next just to share in the cost of a tariff. Koch Industries has such a history of switching names. TransCanada is the operator of the Keystone XL but it does not own majority. By coincidence TransCanada Co. (only the operator is the one lobbying and using Koch Industries former lobbyist Alex McGee.) All we know is Koch Industries has some interest in the Keystone XL because they have been involved in try to get the Keystone XL permit pass by Congress, but know one really knew the reason. Perhaps the reason could be that they do have a direct partnership in this. I have included a limited agreement between ONEOK and Koch and agreement between ONEOK and Northern Borders
These two statements are similar except one refers to TransCanada and one refers to ONEOK.
TransCanada:
“A binding open season for Quintana’s BakkenLink Pipeline commenced on September 27, 2010. On the heels of TransCanada’s Keystone XL open season announcement, the BakkenLink Pipeline will allow shippers to secure transportation to an interconnect with the Keystone XL Pipeline near Baker, MT. If sufficient support is secured,the BakkenLink system would be ready for service in early 2013.”
ONEOK Outlines
New NGL Pipeline
On July 26, 2010, ONEOK Partners
announced plans to construct a new
12 inch natural gas liquids pipeline
capable of moving 60,000-110,000 BPD
from existing and planned facilities in
the Williston Basin to an interconnect
with the Overland Pass Pipeline near
Cheyenne, WY. The new, 525-615 mile,
“Bakken Pipeline” will be built to address
the high volumes of natural gas liquids
that are extracted from the rich Bakken
gas during processing. The pipeline
will operate as a Y-grade system, with
product fractionation taking place in
Bushton, KS. ONEOK is targeting the
first half of 2013 for system startup.
I pick these statements because why you won’t find keystone associated with ONEOK the activities mentioned for TransCanada mimmick each other. ONEOK partners or the North Borders Partner project also in the final phase ends also ends in Illinois.
Also as far as TransCanda announcements of plans to Canada to texas and then to Illionois all happen around the same time. How does one project begin construction and ship oil from Canada and shipping all to the same states,to Texas then to Illinois and not make it in the news and Congressional debates, perhaps if they aren’t the one and the same?
The cases for both are very similar.
Even in the most controversial part of the leg ONEOK has a presence in Nebraska, in 2008 the donated to the 4-H foundation (a foundation there are no reports of them donating to before then.)
No surprise they also mentioned that one time donation on their website. http://www.oneokenergymarketing.com/ChoiceGasPrograms/ContributionsPrograms/4-H.aspx
Also on their website ONEOK mentioned their first time donation to FFA in 2010. These are the only donations to ONEOK that have been made in Nebraska
As you see they never gave before, why the interest in 2008, 2010?
4-H and FFA Contribution Programs
ONEOK Energy Marketing is committed to the future of young Nebraskans and over the past two years we have established contribution programs for FFA and 4-H. Each 4-H club and FFA Chapter in the Choice gas service area receives an initial donation from us every year. Then for every account that signs up with ONEOK Energy Marketing we donate another dollar to each program.
Every state the Keystone pipelines are suppose to be ran the ONEOK partner pipelines are supposed to be ran and the projects began the same year.
There are four phases of the Keystone XL. Around the time ONEOK was making these purchases from Koch Industries, TransCanada Corporation was announced in 2005. I have included that Press Release at the bottom of this blog.
ONEOK purchased several companies from Koch Industries in 2005. ONEOK Partners, LP was formerly known as Koch Hydrocarbon. The other Like Koch Hydrocarbon, ONEOK Partners, LP have had its legal problems. In September 2009 ONEOK Partners LP had legal problems with the SEC. To see actual document: http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Oneok_Partners_LP_(OKS)/Filing/8-K/2009/F6996706
In 2010 Koch Hydrocarbon had fines listed under the name Koch Hydrocarbon, LP from the EPA. I have included a chart below at the bottom of this blog.
As you see below from the discription from business week they say ONEOK Hydrocarbons, LP operates as a subsidiary of Koch Industries, in-spite of the many purshases made by ONEOK from Koch Industries.
ONEOK Hydrocarbons, L.P. processes, stores, and transports natural gas liquids produced including propane, ethane, butane, and natural gasoline; polymer-grade propylene; and olefin fractionation products. In addition, it offers marketing, trading, and risk management services to gas liquids and olefin customers across worldwide. The company was formerly known as Koch Hydrocarbon and changed its name to ONEOK Hydrocarbons, L.P. The company is based in Wichita, Kansas. ONEOK Hydrocarbons, L.P. operates as a subsidiary of Koch Industries Inc.ONEOK Hydrocarbons, L.P. processes, stores, and transports natural gas liquids produced including propane, ethane, butane, and natural gasoline; polymer-grade propylene; and olefin fractionation products. In addition, it offers marketing, trading, and risk management services to gas liquids and olefin customers across worldwide. The company was formerly known as Koch Hydrocarbon and changed its name to ONEOK Hydrocarbons, L.P. The company is based in Wichita, Kansas. ONEOK Hydrocarbons, L.P. operates as a subsidiary of Koch Industries Inc.http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=11732047
A limited liability company (LLC) is a flexible form of enterprise that blends elements of partnership and corporate structures. It is a legal form of company that provides limited liability to its owners in the vast majority of United States jurisdictions. LLCs do not need to be organized for profit.
Often incorrectly called a “limited liability corporation” (instead of company), it is a hybrid business entity having certain characteristics of both a corporation and a partnership or sole proprietorship (depending on how many owners there are)
10.23 Purchase Agreement between Koch Hydrocarbon Management Company, LLC and ONEOK, Inc. dated
May 9, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2005, filed August 3, 2005).
10.24 Asset Purchase Agreement between Koch Pipeline Company, L.P. and ONEOK, Inc. dated May 9, 2005
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed
August 3, 2005).
10.25 Amendment No. 1 to Asset Purchase Agreement between Koch Pipeline Company, L.P. and ONEOK, Inc.
dated June 28, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.25 to our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006, filed March 1, 2007).
10.26 Limited Liability Company Membership Interest Purchase Agreement between Koch Holdings Enterprises,
LLC and ONEOK, Inc. dated May 9, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed August 3, 2005).
10.27 Limited Liability Company Membership Interest Purchase Agreement between Koch Hydrocarbon
Management Company, LLC and ONEOK, Inc. dated May 9, 2005 (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed August 3, 2005).
10.28 Limited Liability Company Membership Interest Purchase Agreement between TXOK Acquisition, Inc.
and ONEOK Energy Resources Company dated September 19, 2005 (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, filed November 4, 2005).
“February 15, 2006 – TransCanada Corporation (TSX, NYSE: TRP) (TransCanada) today announced that it will sell its 17.5 per cent general partner interest in Northern Border Partners, L.P., to a subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc.” http://www.transcanada.com/3138.html
| #2.1 | Contribution Agreement by and among ONEOK, Inc., Northern Border Partners, L.P. and Northern Border Intermediate Limited Partnership dated February 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| #2.2 | First Amendment to Contribution Agreement by and among ONEOK, Inc., Northern Border Partners, L.P. and Northern Border Intermediate Limited Partnership dated April 6, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| #2.3 | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between ONEOK, Inc. and Northern Border Partners, L.P. dated February 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| #2.4 | First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among ONEOK, Inc., Northern Border Partners, L.P. and Northern Border Intermediate Limited Partnership dated April 6, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to Northern Border Partners, L.P.’s Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| #2.5 | Partnership Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Northern Border Intermediate Limited Partnership and TC PipeLines Intermediate Limited Partnership dated as of December 31, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| #2.6 | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among Wisconsin Energy Corporation and WPS Investments, LLC and Northern Border Intermediate Limited Partnership dated as of March 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| †#2.7 | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Williams Field Services Company LLC and Northern Border Intermediate Limited Partnership dated as of May 2, 2006. | |
| †#2.8 | First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement and Assignment, Delegation, Acceptance and Assumption of Rights and Obligations by and among Williams Field Services Company, LLC, ONEOK Partners Intermediate Limited Partnership and ONEOK Overland Pass Holdings, L.L.C. dated as of May 31, 2006. | |
| 3.1 | Northern Border Partners, L.P. Certificate of Limited Partnership, Certificate of Amendment dated February 16, 2001, and Certificate of Amendment dated May 20, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership of Northern Border Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| 3.3 | Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| 3.4 | Northern Border Intermediate Limited Partnership Certificate of Limited Partnership, Certificate of Amendment dated February 16, 2001, and Certificate of Amendment dated May 20, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| †3.5 | Certificate of Formation of ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., as amended. | |
| †3.6 | Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C. | |
| 3.7 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership of Northern Border Intermediate Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)). | |
| 3.8 | Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ONEOK Partners Intermediate Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2006 (File No. 1-12202)) | |
According to a report by business week Koch Industries is affiliated with ONEOK Hydrocarbons, LP. Also according to 2010 EPA records Koch Hydrocarbon, LP still exist long after the 2006 purchase.
Why would ONEOK pick a Hydrocarbons plant?
Canada is the most toxic crude oil in the world and according to this scientific approach to crude oil is a matter of dealing with the hydrocarbons. There are a hundred types of hydrocarbons that are mixed together, and that would explain the necessary of having a Hydrocarbon plant.
“Different hydrocarbon chain lengths all have progressively higher boiling points, so they can all be separated by distillation. This is what happens in an oil refinery – in one part of the process, crude oil is heated and the different chains are pulled out by their vaporization temperatures. Each different chain length has a different property that makes it useful in a different way.”
TC Pipelines, LP otherwise known as TransCanada Pipelines Limited Partners owns part in the controversial pipelines but the corporation TransCanada operates it.
From the TC Pipelines, LP website it says as follows:
“With access to new gas supplies through support from its sponsor, TransCanada Corporation, who also operates our assets on our behalf, TC PipeLines’ assets are primarily connected to one of the largest supply basins in North America that is positioned to recover and grow over the next decade.”http://www.tcpipelineslp.com/
On December 31, 2010, ONEOK became the sole general partner and own 42.8% of ONEOK Partners, L.P. If they own 42.8% who owns the other half.http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/news/business/companies/oneok-inc/index.html
In this 2005 article you would think ONEOK purchaces of all of Koch Hydrocarbon but as before stated even in 2010 ONEOK owned only 42.8% but that was years after the fact they purchased in 2005.
Article Published on May 10, 2005 by Bill Wilson: “Oneok buys Koch system”
ONEOK Inc. has acquired the natural gas liquids businesses owned by several Koch companies for about $1.35 billion.
Included is Koch Hydrocarbon L.P.’s entire mid-continent natural gas liquids business that gathers, processes, stores and markets for processors in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas. The deal gives Oneok (NYSE: OKE) a system that links much of the natural gas liquids supply in Oklahoma, the Texas panhandle and Kansas with two natural gas liquids market centers in Conway, Kan., near McPherson; and Mont Belview, Texas.
In 2006 ONEOK acquired ONEOK NB. ONEOK NB was formerly known as Northwest Border Pipeline Company, an affiliate of TransCanada that held a 0.35 percent general partner interest.
“Northern Border Pipeline is a natural gas pipeline which brings gas from Canada through Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, and Iowa into the Chicago area. It is owned by TC PipeLines, LP and ONEOK Partners and is operated by TC PipeLines, LP . Its FERC code is 89.”
“In 2006, we declared total cash distributions to TransCanada of $0.7 million, which included $0.5 million related to its incentive distribution rights…..
ONEOK Partners GP and TransCanada’s affiliate became the operator of Northern Border Pipeline and entered into a transition services agreement for the transfer of the operator function effective April 1, 2007. Northern Border Pipeline agreed to pay ONEOK Partners GP an amount up to $1.0 million per year for years 2007 through 2011, to reimburse ONEOK Partners GP for shared equipment and furnishings acquired by ONEOK Partners GP and used to support Northern Border Pipeline operations.”
http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Oneok_Partners_LP_(OKS)/Relationship_Transcanada
If you notice the EPA vilolations below Koch Hydrocarbon still actually existed after the purchase of ONEOK, but it became Koch Hydrocarbon,LP (Limited partners which means they became a partner with someone, and the likely choice would be ONEOK since they purchase it. But because ONEOK is considered the General Partner in everything including TransCanada Subsidiary is the very likely the reason everything is given under the name ONEOK limited partnership is used rather than Koch. (It could also be wondered that these name changes are done to hide something whether it be for taxes, anti-trust/monopoly, etc; since Koch Industries holds already assets in the Canada Tar sands).
Chart of Koch Hydrocarbon’s violation’s, and below that I have in included a couple of definitions of a limited Partnership and directly below that the TransCanada Press Release involving the Keystone Pipelines in 2005.
| Case Name | Defendants | Date | Locations | Total Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY | HOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY | 1991-12-17 | 88TH AVE & GUN CLUB ROAD, COMMERCE CITY, CO 80022 | $115,275.00 |
| KOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY | KOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY | 1995-11-08 | 4111 EAST 37TH STREET NORTH, WICHITA, KS 67220 | $60,000.00 |
| Koch Hydrocarbon, LP | Koch Hydrocarbon, LP | 2010-03-12 | HWY 81 1.5 M S, MEDFORD, OK 73759 | $120.00 |
| KOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY | KOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY | 2000-02-03 | HWY 81 1.5M S, MEDFORD, OK 73759 | 0 |
| KOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY, MEDFORD DIVISION | KOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY | 2010-06-16 | HWY 81 1.5M S, MEDFORD, OK 73759 | 0 |
| KOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY, OPERATOR, MB-1 NATURAL GAS FRACTIO | HOCH HYDROCARBON COMPANY | 2010-06-16 | 10844 INTERSTATE 10, MONT BELVIEU, TX 77580 | 0 |
| KOCH HYDROCARBON, L.P. | KOCH HYDROCARBON, L.P. | 2010-06-16 | HWY 81 1.5 M S, MEDFORD, OK 73759 | 0 |
I have included several terms for a limited partnership, LP
The limited partnership, or LP, has become an increasingly popular choice for business owners, especially those involved in real estate or other investment ventures.
Unlike general partnerships, LPs can limit the liability and the involvement of certain partners. This is useful for attracting investment partners who’d like to participate in the profits of the business, but not necessarily in its risks or daily operations. LegalZoom can help you form your LP in 3 simple steps.
http://www.legalzoom.com/limited-partnerships/limited-partnership-overview.html?WT.srch=1&kid=4a7aaae2-2f67-5248-4ba3-000050ebd7d3&se=google&q=keyword&refcd=GO000000000000001s_keyword&tsacr=GO9203867527&cm_mmc_o=7BBTkwCjC1V%20|%20mwzygtCjC1bFbfwp%20VzyfEwyltb5lj1V%201bFbfwp%20VzyfEwyltb5%204blgCjCk5%205zyfEwyltb5&gclid=CKSt5sXWqK0CFQXd4Aodu30OoA
partnership consisting of one or more limited partners and one or more general partners that is structured to find, extract, and market commercial quantities of oil and natural gas. The limited partners, who assume no liability beyond the funds they contribute, buy units in the partnership, typically for at least $5,000 a unit, from a broker registered to sell that partnership. All the limited partners’ money then goes to the general partner, the partner with unlimited liability, who either searches for oil and gas (an exploratory or wildcat well), drills for oil and gas in a proven oil field (a developmental drilling program), or pumps petroleum and gas from an existing well (a completion program). The riskier the chance of finding oil and gas, the higher the potential reward or loss to the limited partner. Conservative investors who mainly want to collect income from the sale of proven oil and gas reserves are safest with a developmental or completion program.
Subject to passive income rules, limited partners also receive tax breaks, such as depreciation deductions for equipment used for drilling and oil depletion allowances for the value of oil extracted from the fields. If the partnership borrows money for increased drilling, limited partners also can get deductions for the interest cost of the loans.
Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/oil-and-gas-limited-partnership#ixzz1hyjm8OBO
http://www.answers.com/topic/oil-and-gas-limited-partnership
A limited partnership between limited partners with limited liability and one or more general partners with unlimited liability, the purpose of which is to find and drill oil or gas from the ground. The general partner uses the investment money from the limited partners to drill in for oil or gas; the typical partnership unit for a limited partner costs $5,000, and the limited partner risks no more than this investment. There are two types of oil and gas drilling limited partnerships. A development oil and gas drilling limited partnership provides for drilling only in places with proven reserves, providing the limited partners with low risk and a steady return. An exploratory oil and gas drilling limited partnership provides for drilling in places without proven reserves, searching for previously undiscovered reserves. This latter carries higher risk, but also the possibility of an extraordinarily high return if a large reserve is discovered.
TransCanada Proposes Keystone Oil Pipeline Project
CALGARY, Alberta – February 9, 2005 – (TSX: TRP) (NYSE: TRP) – TransCanada Corporation today announced it is proposing a US$1.7 billion oil pipeline project to transport approximately 400,000 barrels per day of heavy crude oil from Alberta to Illinois.
Transporting oil from Hardisty, Alberta to markets at Wood River and Patoka, Illinois, the proposed Keystone Pipeline would be about 3,000 kilometres (1,870 miles) in length. In addition to new pipeline construction, it would require the conversion of 1,240 kilometres (770 miles) of one of the lines in TransCanada’s existing multi-line Alberta and Mainline natural gas pipeline systems in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. TransCanada’s other existing pipelines will continue to transport Western Canada’s natural gas to markets in Canada and the United States.
“TransCanada is in the business of connecting energy supplies to markets and we view this opportunity as another way of providing a valuable service to our customers,” said Hal Kvisle, chief executive officer. “Converting one of our natural gas pipeline assets for oil transportation is an innovative, cost competitive way to meet the need for pipeline expansions to accommodate anticipated growth in Canadian crude oil production during the next decade.”
The proposed pipeline would begin in the oil hub of Hardisty, Alberta and extend across Saskatchewan and Manitoba and down through North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Missouri and Illinois.
TransCanada will continue to meet with oil producers, refiners and industry groups, including the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, to gauge additional interest and support for the Keystone project. Preliminary discussions with stakeholders including communities, government representatives and landowners along the proposed route have begun.
Later this year, producers, refiners and marketers interested in securing capacity on the pipeline will be invited to participate in a customary, industry-wide Open Season process. TransCanada has received support for this project from a number of producers and refiners. When sufficient support for this project from oil producers and shippers is obtained, TransCanada will proceed with the necessary regulatory applications.
TransCanada will require regulatory approvals from a variety of Canadian and U.S. agencies before construction can begin. Input from all stakeholders will be received through the regulatory process and an extensive public consultation process.
To view a map of the proposed pipeline route and other information about the Keystone project, please visit the project web page at http://www.transcanada.com/keystone
TransCanada is a leading North American energy company. TransCanada is focused on natural gas transmission and power services with employees who are expert in these businesses. TransCanada’s network of approximately 41,000 kilometres (25,600 miles) of pipeline transports the majority of Western Canada’s natural gas production to the fastest growing markets in Canada and the United States. TransCanada owns, controls or is constructing more than 4,700 megawatts of power generation – enough to meet the electricity needs of about 4.7 million average households. The Company’s common shares trade under the symbol TRP on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges.
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain information in this news release is forward-looking and is subject to important risks and uncertainties. The results or events predicted in this information may differ from actual results or events. Factors which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, the ability of TransCanada to successfully implement its strategic initiatives and whether such strategic initiatives will yield the expected benefits, the availability and price of energy commodities, regulatory decisions, competitive factors in the pipeline and power industry sectors, and the current economic conditions in North America. For additional information on these and other factors, see the reports filed by TransCanada with Canadian securities regulators and with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TransCanada disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Frederica Cade's Blog 
Reblogged this on Hello100blog.
Posted by hello100blog | December 30, 2011, 4:50 pm